It's been over a year and a half since I last posted here. To understand why, please check out my first post on my new blog over at lukestokes.info, Losing Eternity.
Thanks, and much love. I hope you'll follow me there, and we can have interesting discussions together.
Sunday, February 14, 2016
Tuesday, May 06, 2014
The Road to Anarchy
Some new ideas ignite my passion like a match to gasoline. Sometimes my wife complains because the language I use implies I'm absolutely positive of what I'm saying instead of just stating an opinion for discussion, pushback, and debate. This is a flaw of mine, to be sure, but I do enjoy duking out ideas because I learn much faster talking to really smart people who disagree with me.
I felt this way about Hypermedia APIs and Bitcoin. More recently, I'm digging into Voluntaryism which is really just a friendly name for Anarchy (not the "civil war" version of the word you're probably envisioning... it's amazing how language can be manipulated).
My journey of exploration started with Bitcoin's libertarian roots. From there I realized the truth in the joke which says the only difference between a libertarian and an anarchist is about 12 months (for me it was much less, it seems, though I'm still not sure if I would consider myself an "anarchist"). Things started bothering me. The logical arguments against the need for a state became quite compelling. I've read books, listened to podcasts, watched interviews and videos and all of it seems to make a lot of sense.
The driving force behind my passion and motivation, I think, has to do with the number 260 million. Some argue government action has killed that many people. Additionally, the voluntaryism Wikipedia page lists Jesus Christ among the notable historical figures in that movement. As a follower of Christ, that immediately peaked my interest. I think he had some pretty good ideas about how to structure society and love people as we all want to be loved.
The search for truth is a perilous journey. You may have to question everything you know. You may have to throw out ideas which you previously wholeheartedly defended. This is how humanity progresses forward. This is how we develop moral ways to pick cotton.
In this post I'll attempt to summarize the ideas I've collected from various sources up to this point. I'm beginning to think the state may be irrelevant and voluntaryism may be an effective way to organize society. I'll link below to many of the resources I've consumed over the last few months and will probably add more over time. I really hope you give them some of your attention.
One of the foundational concepts is the NAP: the non-aggression principle. It's a moral framework which argues any human action which initiates violence against another human is illegitimate. Additionally, the concept of property rights arises because without it you're stuck with a logical fallacy. If there is no such thing as owning something, how can one person steal from another since they couldn't maintain ownership of the thing they steal?
The next conclusion I've heard discussed is that if we own our own bodies, then actions like rape and murder are violations of our property rights. If initiating violence is a universally immoral act, why is it one of the things the government and the state is said to be needed for? They have a monopoly on the creation of currency and on the use of violence. Would individuals kill millions of people without the state?
It seems throughout history only governments participate in these activities at such a mass scale. If we believe humans are so evil and corrupt and they cannot be trusted without a centralized authority, then why do we think it logically follows to take a subset of those humans and put them into positions of absolute central authority? These same humans have been shown time and time again to lie, cheat, and steal in order to obtain and maintain power. We have a high concentration of psychopaths, megalomaniacs, and narcissists in political office. They seek out power.
If power corrupts and humans are corruptible why do we create and support systems and structures that centralize power which only increases over time?
In spite of the data suggesting 260 million people may have been killed because of illegitimate rulers, many statists argue against anarchism ("Who's going to build muh roads?"). If the state has always been the provider of bread, the same argument would be made when thinking about privatizing bread production. They say we can't trust the markets to accomplish this or that, but really the market is just a free voluntary exchange of value. Not trusting the market really means we want to initiate force and use violence so our way is implemented instead of what is mutually agreed upon.
There are many who argue a limited government would be ideal. They argue government is needed for things like national defense and justice. Arguments can be made to the contrary (private security forces, arbitration and reputation services, etc), but I think history does a better job of explaining why these ideas may be shortsighted. The smallest governments in the world tend to create the most prosperity. They also eventually grow into the largest governments. If government is a cancer, I'd rather have no cancer at all.
Some define government as a group of people who are given rights no other human has and which are morally unacceptable (such as the violation of the NAP). There is no moral argument which can justify setting up such a structure.
As we learn more about psychology and the way the human mind works, the manipulations in place attempting to justify illegitimate authority become clear. These are mind hacks; propaganda and PR pioneered by people like Edward Bernays.
If taxation, for example, is actually theft, it's quite amazing how we have been programmed to believe it is our moral duty. People mention a social contract, though a contract implies a voluntary agreement. Most people don't know there was no mandated federal income tax prior to 1913. We don't need taxes in order to accomplish social goals. Using violence to force one group of people to give their earned value to another group of people (or worse, to build the war machine) is immoral, no matter what label you give it.
Governments create monopolies and enable corporations to have powers no individual has and no group of people should have. Without the air of legitimacy governments create, I believe many of the corruptions we deal with today would evaporate. The market isn't free because almost every aspect of it is controlled by central authority. Will there be new problems? Sure. Free markets solve problems better than centralized bureaucracies.
Now onto my personal view: I believe the purpose of a thing is defined in the mind of its creator. If someone builds a table, a chair, or a car, they define the purpose of that creation. If human beings have a creator, that creator has established their purpose. Based on property rights, it follows the creator has absolute authority and ownership of those created beings. I personally believe God, through Jesus, gave up that authority by giving us free will. A good analogy for this would be our own children. Though we created them, and as babies our authority over their life is essential, if we do our job well as parents we will eventually give up any authority over them so they can become completely separate humans.
What if the controlling, domineering human authority we see around us today is actually a myth? What if government is just a system of control? Even in the Old Testament God continually told his people they should not have a king. The king didn't create the people, so what authority could the king legitimately have?
Deep in our very being, we know, even as young children, we were born to be free. Freedom and liberty have to be systematically removed by educational processes for humans to believe in non-freedom.
Anarchy isn't about no rules, no law, or no consequences. It's about voluntary exchange as the basis for human interaction. It's about peaceful parenting to remove the root causes of many of the psychopathic actors we see in society. Epigenetics can even show us what type of early childhood abuse took place in these sociopaths via brain scans. Many of the fears we have about an uncontrolled society could become irrelevant if enough education and support was provided to parents to raise their kids without violence, coercion, or oppression.
Many will dismiss this idea as an unrealistic "utopia." If you use that word, you'll be using the parts of your brain which deal with fairy tales, not logic and fact. It's much easier to dismiss than to rationally consider. The more I learn about it, the more I think it models The Way or the Kingdom of God which Jesus and his early followers were known for.
Unfortunately, it seems atheists are the ones most commonly spreading these ideas of voluntaryism and anarchy while the religious are the ones saluting the flag and calling for people to vote for their favorite candidate as if this time their version of morality will be effectively legislated.
Jesus, arguably one of the greatest leaders and influencers in history, never used violence (the initiation of force) or coercion. Those who followed him did so voluntarily. Unlike what you may have been taught in Sunday School, he also wasn't a pacifist. He made a whip to defend his father's house and drive out the thieves and moneychangers.
Whether you're an atheist, Christian or follow some other religion, you most likely see problems in the world and want to make it better. Thinking differently about government may be the first step towards that better world.
Resources
I felt this way about Hypermedia APIs and Bitcoin. More recently, I'm digging into Voluntaryism which is really just a friendly name for Anarchy (not the "civil war" version of the word you're probably envisioning... it's amazing how language can be manipulated).
My journey of exploration started with Bitcoin's libertarian roots. From there I realized the truth in the joke which says the only difference between a libertarian and an anarchist is about 12 months (for me it was much less, it seems, though I'm still not sure if I would consider myself an "anarchist"). Things started bothering me. The logical arguments against the need for a state became quite compelling. I've read books, listened to podcasts, watched interviews and videos and all of it seems to make a lot of sense.
The driving force behind my passion and motivation, I think, has to do with the number 260 million. Some argue government action has killed that many people. Additionally, the voluntaryism Wikipedia page lists Jesus Christ among the notable historical figures in that movement. As a follower of Christ, that immediately peaked my interest. I think he had some pretty good ideas about how to structure society and love people as we all want to be loved.
The search for truth is a perilous journey. You may have to question everything you know. You may have to throw out ideas which you previously wholeheartedly defended. This is how humanity progresses forward. This is how we develop moral ways to pick cotton.
In this post I'll attempt to summarize the ideas I've collected from various sources up to this point. I'm beginning to think the state may be irrelevant and voluntaryism may be an effective way to organize society. I'll link below to many of the resources I've consumed over the last few months and will probably add more over time. I really hope you give them some of your attention.
One of the foundational concepts is the NAP: the non-aggression principle. It's a moral framework which argues any human action which initiates violence against another human is illegitimate. Additionally, the concept of property rights arises because without it you're stuck with a logical fallacy. If there is no such thing as owning something, how can one person steal from another since they couldn't maintain ownership of the thing they steal?
The next conclusion I've heard discussed is that if we own our own bodies, then actions like rape and murder are violations of our property rights. If initiating violence is a universally immoral act, why is it one of the things the government and the state is said to be needed for? They have a monopoly on the creation of currency and on the use of violence. Would individuals kill millions of people without the state?
It seems throughout history only governments participate in these activities at such a mass scale. If we believe humans are so evil and corrupt and they cannot be trusted without a centralized authority, then why do we think it logically follows to take a subset of those humans and put them into positions of absolute central authority? These same humans have been shown time and time again to lie, cheat, and steal in order to obtain and maintain power. We have a high concentration of psychopaths, megalomaniacs, and narcissists in political office. They seek out power.
If power corrupts and humans are corruptible why do we create and support systems and structures that centralize power which only increases over time?
In spite of the data suggesting 260 million people may have been killed because of illegitimate rulers, many statists argue against anarchism ("Who's going to build muh roads?"). If the state has always been the provider of bread, the same argument would be made when thinking about privatizing bread production. They say we can't trust the markets to accomplish this or that, but really the market is just a free voluntary exchange of value. Not trusting the market really means we want to initiate force and use violence so our way is implemented instead of what is mutually agreed upon.
There are many who argue a limited government would be ideal. They argue government is needed for things like national defense and justice. Arguments can be made to the contrary (private security forces, arbitration and reputation services, etc), but I think history does a better job of explaining why these ideas may be shortsighted. The smallest governments in the world tend to create the most prosperity. They also eventually grow into the largest governments. If government is a cancer, I'd rather have no cancer at all.
Some define government as a group of people who are given rights no other human has and which are morally unacceptable (such as the violation of the NAP). There is no moral argument which can justify setting up such a structure.
As we learn more about psychology and the way the human mind works, the manipulations in place attempting to justify illegitimate authority become clear. These are mind hacks; propaganda and PR pioneered by people like Edward Bernays.
If taxation, for example, is actually theft, it's quite amazing how we have been programmed to believe it is our moral duty. People mention a social contract, though a contract implies a voluntary agreement. Most people don't know there was no mandated federal income tax prior to 1913. We don't need taxes in order to accomplish social goals. Using violence to force one group of people to give their earned value to another group of people (or worse, to build the war machine) is immoral, no matter what label you give it.
Governments create monopolies and enable corporations to have powers no individual has and no group of people should have. Without the air of legitimacy governments create, I believe many of the corruptions we deal with today would evaporate. The market isn't free because almost every aspect of it is controlled by central authority. Will there be new problems? Sure. Free markets solve problems better than centralized bureaucracies.
Now onto my personal view: I believe the purpose of a thing is defined in the mind of its creator. If someone builds a table, a chair, or a car, they define the purpose of that creation. If human beings have a creator, that creator has established their purpose. Based on property rights, it follows the creator has absolute authority and ownership of those created beings. I personally believe God, through Jesus, gave up that authority by giving us free will. A good analogy for this would be our own children. Though we created them, and as babies our authority over their life is essential, if we do our job well as parents we will eventually give up any authority over them so they can become completely separate humans.
What if the controlling, domineering human authority we see around us today is actually a myth? What if government is just a system of control? Even in the Old Testament God continually told his people they should not have a king. The king didn't create the people, so what authority could the king legitimately have?
Deep in our very being, we know, even as young children, we were born to be free. Freedom and liberty have to be systematically removed by educational processes for humans to believe in non-freedom.
Anarchy isn't about no rules, no law, or no consequences. It's about voluntary exchange as the basis for human interaction. It's about peaceful parenting to remove the root causes of many of the psychopathic actors we see in society. Epigenetics can even show us what type of early childhood abuse took place in these sociopaths via brain scans. Many of the fears we have about an uncontrolled society could become irrelevant if enough education and support was provided to parents to raise their kids without violence, coercion, or oppression.
Many will dismiss this idea as an unrealistic "utopia." If you use that word, you'll be using the parts of your brain which deal with fairy tales, not logic and fact. It's much easier to dismiss than to rationally consider. The more I learn about it, the more I think it models The Way or the Kingdom of God which Jesus and his early followers were known for.
Unfortunately, it seems atheists are the ones most commonly spreading these ideas of voluntaryism and anarchy while the religious are the ones saluting the flag and calling for people to vote for their favorite candidate as if this time their version of morality will be effectively legislated.
Jesus, arguably one of the greatest leaders and influencers in history, never used violence (the initiation of force) or coercion. Those who followed him did so voluntarily. Unlike what you may have been taught in Sunday School, he also wasn't a pacifist. He made a whip to defend his father's house and drive out the thieves and moneychangers.
Whether you're an atheist, Christian or follow some other religion, you most likely see problems in the world and want to make it better. Thinking differently about government may be the first step towards that better world.
Resources
Stefan Molyneux
The Story of Your Enslavement 13 minutes
Beautiful Freedom 18 minutes
Beautiful Freedom Part 2 23 minutes
The Bomb in the Brain: The True Roots of Human Violence 3 hours (series)
Everyday Anarchy 3 hours, 44 minutes (audio book)
Introduction to Philosophy (podcast, 18 episodes)
Philosophical Parenting (podcast, 75 episodes)
Introduction to Philosophy (podcast, 18 episodes)
Philosophical Parenting (podcast, 75 episodes)
Murray Rothbard
For a New Liberty 7+ hours (audio book)
Larken Rose
Free Your Mind 2 Conference 2013 54 minutes
Message to the Voting Cattle 20 minutes
(Actually, just watch all his YouTube videos)
Miscellany
Law without Government: Conflict Resolution in a Free Society 10 minutes
The State Is Not Great: How Government Poisons Everything 50 minutes
The Obviousness of Anarchy 1 hour, 6 minutes (9 videos)
The Obviousness of Anarchy 1 hour, 6 minutes (9 videos)
Saturday, March 01, 2014
Open Letter to My Old Boss Dave Ramsey About Bitcoin
Dave,
Let me start by saying I have great respect for you. I worked for you for just under four years, and it was the best job I've ever had. You've helped millions of families, including my own, get out of debt and make sound financial decisions. You're one of the smartest, most successful people I've ever had the privilege of learning from.
I also respectfully think you've made a mistake with your stance on bitcoin.
On April 8th 2013, I sent you an email making myself available as a resource related to Bitcoin. You were kind enough to reply with "I have no idea what you are talking about. I am sadly ignorant of that world." My intention was to help you be a well informed voice in the media on this issue.
I remember when you expressed negative opinions concerning social media, you turned to those with more experience to make a case for its value. Now with over a half a million Twitter followers, you'd probably agree it was wise to change your opinion there.
I believe Bitcoin will be bigger than Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube combined. I've argued it could be more disruptive than the Internet. Investor / entrepreneurs such as Chris Dixon and Marc Andreesen (the creator of the first web browser) feel the same way. Andreesen compares Bitcoin in 2014 to personal computers in 1975 and the Internet in 1993.
The most incredible thing about Bitcoin isn't the currency (bitcoin). It's the protocol (Bitcoin), a system of rules for maintaining a decentralized public consensus network. A trust-less system controlled by math (cryptography), not central planners. It may end up being one of the most transformative inventions of my lifetime.
Someone brought this video to my attention today where you ask, Is Bitcoin a Good Investment? I also found your blog post where you say you don't like it one bit.
I agree with your assessment it's unwise and stupid to keep a life savings in the hands of a third party. MtGox is not Bitcoin. It's a poorly run centralized exchange which the Bitcoin community has been telling people to avoid for many months, if not years.
In the video you mention problems with the pre-FDIC banking system and with trust and transparency in general. You also give a great explanation as to what gives money value—the extent someone else wants to trade for it. I applaud you for clearly saying our fiat currency paper money "never really had value" either, other than what people are willing to trade for it.
(Side note: I've purchased electronic equipment, a TV, advertising for my company, and a hotel stay using bitcoin).
You start losing me around five and a half minutes in when you start discussing bitcoin and how it's "looking like it's not going to make it." The "death" of bitcoin has been reported so many times over the last few years, it's really becoming ridiculous for the media industry. You further describe "intelligent people, while intelligent are not wise" who have purchased bitcoin. I think much of wisdom comes from experience.
Dave, you have little or no experience when it comes to open source, peer-to-peer cryptographic currencies. As you said in your email last year, you are "ignorant of that world." Your recent comments indicate you haven't yet done your research.
Calling bitcoin the "Iraqi Dinar of the Internet" communicates ignorance of what bitcoin is. You describe it as "something whacko like that" and a "made-up computer game." You're convinced people who believe in this technology (and the currency on top of it) are "stupid and will lose their money."
How can you be so sure? Have you studied how it solves the Byzantine Generals' Problem? Do you know how the Bitcoin protocol could potentially replace centralized financial and trust systems such as notaries, escrows, trust funds, stock exchanges, clearing houses, payment networks, checking and savings accounts, etc...?
Do you know how disruptive and beneficial programmable money could be to society? Have you thought about the opportunities for freedom which will be created when individuals can control their own store of value, even if they are unbanked in a third world country with nothing but a cell phone?
For me, this comment summarizes your current level of understanding: "One of these computer nerds just flips a switch, the whole freaking thing is gone." Did you know the decentralized Bitcoin network has more computing power (be it for a very specific purpose) than the major super computers of the world combined? There is no centralized "switch" to turn off. Also, unlike M0 (physical money) which makes up around 8% of the money supply, most bitcoin are stored in offline wallets also known as paper wallets. This digital currency is more physical that the money you use every day.
Just as peer-to-peer systems disrupted the music industry, this can not be stopped. Blockbuster may have disliked Netflix's approach, but that didn't prevent Blockbuster from becoming irrelevant.
The good news is, you probably have a few years before you have to reevaluate your stance on bitcoin. Bitcoin is very volatile and will probably remain so for years to come. If it becomes as revolutionary as some believe, your current stance could hinder your credibility as a financial guru. As you've helped myself and so many others, I'd hate to see that happen. My hope is you'll follow the same path as other skeptics who did their own research and eventually came to the conclusion bitcoin is here to stay.
My original offer still stands. If you'd like to know more about Bitcoin, please let me know.
Respectfully,
Luke Stokes
P.S. With a small investment of time, you can understand the Bitcoin protocol and the bitcoin currency. :)
Let me start by saying I have great respect for you. I worked for you for just under four years, and it was the best job I've ever had. You've helped millions of families, including my own, get out of debt and make sound financial decisions. You're one of the smartest, most successful people I've ever had the privilege of learning from.
I also respectfully think you've made a mistake with your stance on bitcoin.
On April 8th 2013, I sent you an email making myself available as a resource related to Bitcoin. You were kind enough to reply with "I have no idea what you are talking about. I am sadly ignorant of that world." My intention was to help you be a well informed voice in the media on this issue.
I remember when you expressed negative opinions concerning social media, you turned to those with more experience to make a case for its value. Now with over a half a million Twitter followers, you'd probably agree it was wise to change your opinion there.
I believe Bitcoin will be bigger than Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube combined. I've argued it could be more disruptive than the Internet. Investor / entrepreneurs such as Chris Dixon and Marc Andreesen (the creator of the first web browser) feel the same way. Andreesen compares Bitcoin in 2014 to personal computers in 1975 and the Internet in 1993.
The most incredible thing about Bitcoin isn't the currency (bitcoin). It's the protocol (Bitcoin), a system of rules for maintaining a decentralized public consensus network. A trust-less system controlled by math (cryptography), not central planners. It may end up being one of the most transformative inventions of my lifetime.
Someone brought this video to my attention today where you ask, Is Bitcoin a Good Investment? I also found your blog post where you say you don't like it one bit.
I agree with your assessment it's unwise and stupid to keep a life savings in the hands of a third party. MtGox is not Bitcoin. It's a poorly run centralized exchange which the Bitcoin community has been telling people to avoid for many months, if not years.
In the video you mention problems with the pre-FDIC banking system and with trust and transparency in general. You also give a great explanation as to what gives money value—the extent someone else wants to trade for it. I applaud you for clearly saying our fiat currency paper money "never really had value" either, other than what people are willing to trade for it.
(Side note: I've purchased electronic equipment, a TV, advertising for my company, and a hotel stay using bitcoin).
You start losing me around five and a half minutes in when you start discussing bitcoin and how it's "looking like it's not going to make it." The "death" of bitcoin has been reported so many times over the last few years, it's really becoming ridiculous for the media industry. You further describe "intelligent people, while intelligent are not wise" who have purchased bitcoin. I think much of wisdom comes from experience.
Dave, you have little or no experience when it comes to open source, peer-to-peer cryptographic currencies. As you said in your email last year, you are "ignorant of that world." Your recent comments indicate you haven't yet done your research.
Calling bitcoin the "Iraqi Dinar of the Internet" communicates ignorance of what bitcoin is. You describe it as "something whacko like that" and a "made-up computer game." You're convinced people who believe in this technology (and the currency on top of it) are "stupid and will lose their money."
How can you be so sure? Have you studied how it solves the Byzantine Generals' Problem? Do you know how the Bitcoin protocol could potentially replace centralized financial and trust systems such as notaries, escrows, trust funds, stock exchanges, clearing houses, payment networks, checking and savings accounts, etc...?
Do you know how disruptive and beneficial programmable money could be to society? Have you thought about the opportunities for freedom which will be created when individuals can control their own store of value, even if they are unbanked in a third world country with nothing but a cell phone?
For me, this comment summarizes your current level of understanding: "One of these computer nerds just flips a switch, the whole freaking thing is gone." Did you know the decentralized Bitcoin network has more computing power (be it for a very specific purpose) than the major super computers of the world combined? There is no centralized "switch" to turn off. Also, unlike M0 (physical money) which makes up around 8% of the money supply, most bitcoin are stored in offline wallets also known as paper wallets. This digital currency is more physical that the money you use every day.
Just as peer-to-peer systems disrupted the music industry, this can not be stopped. Blockbuster may have disliked Netflix's approach, but that didn't prevent Blockbuster from becoming irrelevant.
The good news is, you probably have a few years before you have to reevaluate your stance on bitcoin. Bitcoin is very volatile and will probably remain so for years to come. If it becomes as revolutionary as some believe, your current stance could hinder your credibility as a financial guru. As you've helped myself and so many others, I'd hate to see that happen. My hope is you'll follow the same path as other skeptics who did their own research and eventually came to the conclusion bitcoin is here to stay.
My original offer still stands. If you'd like to know more about Bitcoin, please let me know.
Respectfully,
Luke Stokes
P.S. With a small investment of time, you can understand the Bitcoin protocol and the bitcoin currency. :)
Sunday, February 16, 2014
Understand Bitcoin in 30 Minutes
As more people hear about Bitcoin in the media, more people ask themselves, "What the heck is a Bitcoin?"
I think it could be one of the most important and disruptive inventions of my (and your) lifetime.
If I'm right (or maybe only partly right), maybe you should invest some time into learning about it now. How about 30 minutes? That's not too long, right? We'll start slow. Ready?
Let's start with this post from successcouncil copied and reposted by sumBTC in the Bitcoin subreddit:
Here's another great read which will eat up 6 minutes: Explain Bitcoin Like I’m Five.
At this point, you have the basics. And we're only 10 minutes in!
OK, now we're moving past the kid's stuff. Time to put on your big boy pants. This is the original and best description of the entire system. The original Bitcoin Paper by Satoshi Nakamoto (whoever that is). Go ahead and give it a read. It will take about 20 minutes. If you're more of an audible learner, you can listen to Stefan Monyluex read it to you here.
I started learning about Bitcoin over a year ago and unfortunately did not read the Bitcoin Paper early on. I opened it up, saw academic looking diagrams, scary math symbols and such and quickly closed it. Please, try to give it a read. It's only 8 pages. If you can get through it, you'll understand more about Bitcoin than many of the reporters I've seen commenting on it over the last year.
30 minutes isn't too much of an investment for understanding this incredible system. The next time someone mentions Bitcoin, tell them you've read the original paper. They will be impressed.
If this post saved you some time, feel free to send a portion of that saved time to me as bitcoin. You can use your normal average hourly rate :) 1KkCSkdjsjQyxfTbrZrrnsY31XZziWzhzN
Did that do it for you? Do you get it now? Please leave a comment and let me know. Also, please share your favorite resources explaining Bitcoin.
Some other posts I've done you may enjoy:
I think it could be one of the most important and disruptive inventions of my (and your) lifetime.
If I'm right (or maybe only partly right), maybe you should invest some time into learning about it now. How about 30 minutes? That's not too long, right? We'll start slow. Ready?
Let's start with this post from successcouncil copied and reposted by sumBTC in the Bitcoin subreddit:
I say... the Internet makes everything better right? Email is better than sending letters, Google is better than card catalogs at a library. But we didn’t have real Internet money until recently. It turns out there was a really good reason: How do I know you didn't copy your Internet money and send it to someone else before you sent it to me? Meaning, you used the same money twice. Well this long standing problem only got solved a few years back by some unknown genius and now we have real Internet money. Soon the whole world will be using it, just like Email and Google.So... Internet money. Cool. But it's more than that... if you're a visual / audio learner, hit up this 4 minute intro video:
Here's another great read which will eat up 6 minutes: Explain Bitcoin Like I’m Five.
At this point, you have the basics. And we're only 10 minutes in!
OK, now we're moving past the kid's stuff. Time to put on your big boy pants. This is the original and best description of the entire system. The original Bitcoin Paper by Satoshi Nakamoto (whoever that is). Go ahead and give it a read. It will take about 20 minutes. If you're more of an audible learner, you can listen to Stefan Monyluex read it to you here.
I started learning about Bitcoin over a year ago and unfortunately did not read the Bitcoin Paper early on. I opened it up, saw academic looking diagrams, scary math symbols and such and quickly closed it. Please, try to give it a read. It's only 8 pages. If you can get through it, you'll understand more about Bitcoin than many of the reporters I've seen commenting on it over the last year.
30 minutes isn't too much of an investment for understanding this incredible system. The next time someone mentions Bitcoin, tell them you've read the original paper. They will be impressed.
If this post saved you some time, feel free to send a portion of that saved time to me as bitcoin. You can use your normal average hourly rate :) 1KkCSkdjsjQyxfTbrZrrnsY31XZziWzhzN
Did that do it for you? Do you get it now? Please leave a comment and let me know. Also, please share your favorite resources explaining Bitcoin.
Some other posts I've done you may enjoy:
- March 2013 - Bitcoin: DO YOU SPEAK IT???
- April 2013 - My Bitcoin Obsession
- April 2013 - Why Does FoxyCart Support Bitcoin?
- November 2013 - Could Bitcoin Be More Disruptive than the Internet?
- December 2013 - Why Shouldn't You Accept Bitcoin?
- December 2013 - So You Got Some Bitcoin… Now What?
- March 2014 - Open Letter to My Old Boss Dave Ramsey About Bitcoin
Wednesday, January 01, 2014
Twitter is stealing from my blog
This blog exists as a projection of myself. It doesn't have some larger financial or career agenda. As such, I don't give it the focus it deserves. I've further noticed other outlets are stealing from my blog. Microblogging lets off the steam between my ears, usually 140 characters at a time.
Twitter is making me a terribly inconsistent blogger.
Instead of fighting that truth, I thought about embracing it and making a post about some of my favorite tweets over the last few months. Maybe I'll extend it to a full year, eventually. I mostly excluded links to great content or my favorite replies and RTs.
Cheating? Maybe. But hey, it's my content, right?
Hope you enjoy my ramblings. Follow me over at @lukestokes for more (which, admittedly, has been mostly about Bitcoin lately).
Have you ever put together a blog post of your favorite tweets? If so, link it up in the comments.
Twitter is making me a terribly inconsistent blogger.
Instead of fighting that truth, I thought about embracing it and making a post about some of my favorite tweets over the last few months. Maybe I'll extend it to a full year, eventually. I mostly excluded links to great content or my favorite replies and RTs.
Cheating? Maybe. But hey, it's my content, right?
Hope you enjoy my ramblings. Follow me over at @lukestokes for more (which, admittedly, has been mostly about Bitcoin lately).
Have you ever put together a blog post of your favorite tweets? If so, link it up in the comments.
December 2013
Will 2013 be known as the year of the beards or are people just getting started?
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) January 1, 2014
Is this a bubble? pic.twitter.com/c2glBsOgSt
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 28, 2013
Currency wars, capital controls, hyperinflation, bail-ins, stagflation, debasement, market manipulation... things we should discuss in 2014?
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 27, 2013
If you gave or received bitcoins this Christmas, this post is for you: http://t.co/MkncDdHY9G
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 27, 2013
Free centralized services like Twitter and Facebook may die as they increase revenue, annoy users, and get replaced by the next thing.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 26, 2013
Via, Veritas, Vita - May the Way, the Truth, and the Life find you this Christmas season and clothe you in grace. Merry Christmas.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 25, 2013
Until we transition to a push system for commerce instead of a pull system, we will see many more Target-like hacks. #bitcoin
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 23, 2013
Beautiful day in Southern California. Played a disc golf course at Lake Casitas for the first time. pic.twitter.com/sAHlZtGPpm
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 22, 2013
Mind control is simply fully understanding the system (worldview) and controlling inputs for the expected outputs.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 21, 2013
What if the things which go viral on social media are actually unit tests for more advanced mind control systems?
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 21, 2013
"That was fun!" - my 4yo commenting on our eroding freedoms as he passes through #TSA security.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 20, 2013
Been an interesting week. Got a shout out in Forbes http://t.co/o0OkajSz4Y and the Tennessean http://t.co/qIt2nYsf0P
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 20, 2013
John 2:15
and he made a scourge of cords, and cast all out of the temple... he poured out the changers' money, and overthrew their tables;
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 20, 2013
Was at a party with an ornament gift exchange where people had to guess who gave what. I ended up with my own gift. pic.twitter.com/7fWKMSh0W8
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 20, 2013
The bitcoin price is up 3,000% since I first heard about it earlier this year. The potential for change is even more exciting.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 19, 2013
#Bitcoin lore: Goxed, march-2013-fork, To the moon!!! ┗(°0°)┛, "intrinsic" value, BFL, panic buy, and just maybe... #Dogecoin (?)
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 16, 2013
Was tempted to relax and watch something entertaining on Netflix. Got caught up reading posts on the future of money instead. No complaints.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 16, 2013
I think 2013 will be an amazing year in my memory. A relatively obscure technology catches my attention and consumes my focus. #Bitcoin
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 13, 2013
I'm glad early adopters of the Internet didn't abandon it because TCP/IP seemed "complicated"
#Bitcoin: a platform for decentralized trust.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 11, 2013
First #Nashville #Bitcoin meetup! :) pic.twitter.com/7CH7hNWI6D
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 10, 2013
I'm at the point where someone could read an excerpt directly from 1984 and call it the latest NSA scandal. It wouldn't even surprise me.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 5, 2013
Tech bubble.
Housing bubble.
Money bubble...?
If so, how will it impact commerce and society?
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 3, 2013
My first rule of Bitcoin: Don't sell Bitcoin.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) December 2, 2013
November 2013
How often do you wonder if we're living in someone else's Minecraft server? #matrix #inception #thirteenthfloor
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 30, 2013
The main stream media doesn't realize there is a growing number of people who aren't investing in #Bitcoin. They are transitioning to it.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 29, 2013
Am I the only one who wonders which IP belongs to the NSA every time I do a traceroute?
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 29, 2013
Most critiques of #Bitcoin are actually Keynesian vs. Austrian economic theory debates. I want to yell, "It's the technology, stupid!"
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 28, 2013
Some things have to start out complex before they can be simplified and utilized by the masses. Props to those who can navigate complexity.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 28, 2013
If you could have bought stock or somehow owned a share of value of the Internet when it was getting going in the 90's, would you?
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 26, 2013
Applying a patch, and I'm not using cvs, svn, or git. pic.twitter.com/DJDDINYUU3
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 24, 2013
Banks and financial institutions should take note of how quickly disruptive technology changes things. They should learn from Blockbuster.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 22, 2013
Who is Satoshi Nakamoto?
Who is John Galt?
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 22, 2013
The current price of Bitcoin is... Not as important as how disruptive it will be to the world financial markets which enslave people.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 21, 2013
A Bitcoin on Coinbase is going for over $510. Amazing. Makes the previous spike look like a blip. pic.twitter.com/sJ5HYZ9M24
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 18, 2013
"We have proposed a system for electronic transactions without relying on trust." These 9 pages may change the world: http://t.co/eOIlTmN8wm
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 18, 2013
Today's revolutionaries won't use muskets and bayonets. They will use cryptography and decentralization.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 17, 2013
HSBC and "too big to fail" law breakers are serious problems the world isn't talking enough about. This fiat banking system is broken.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 17, 2013
Life comes with tragedy and joy, despair and hope, suffering and salvation. The thing which makes it work is you. Relationships matter.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 16, 2013
“@trutherbot: pic.twitter.com/QTW2iGunmY” One of my favorites :)
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 15, 2013
Please get informed about #TPP: http://t.co/7AK2wY1bKP It's more than a globalist conspiracy theory.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 14, 2013
The U.S. joined #TPP talks in Dec 2009 and there have already been 19 rounds of negotiations. Obama wants to fast track through congress.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 14, 2013
I'll remember 11/12/13 as my first contribution to Hacker News: http://t.co/KAxT8y0Sei Also, Marc Andreessen added a comment. :)
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 12, 2013
The idea is simple: Borrow $1 at interest. How do you pay it back? If that's the only $1, you have to borrow another $ (also at interest).
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 12, 2013
OH: What's the difference between a libertarian and an anarchist?
A year.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 10, 2013
College athletes aren't allowed to talk to boosters, but those in congress can secure future lobbying jobs while still in office? WAT?
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 8, 2013
If you invested $10k in Bitcoin when I blogged about it on March 2nd, you'd have $74,594 today.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 7, 2013
A what point do we start seriously considering civil disobedience against this out of control federal government?
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 7, 2013
If you someday change the world, you may point to a key day when your idea was put into action. Could today be that day?
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 6, 2013
As much as I'd love to jack in some day and learn kung fu, I'd probably never trust the security infrastructure of the Nebuchadnezzar.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 6, 2013
Great relationships give us stories, emotions, truth, and trust. Let's build some today.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 5, 2013
I love how Bitcoin developers can simulate proposed weaknesses on the test network. Can't do that with USD or our financial system.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 5, 2013
There's this thing called Bitcoin which is a decentralized digital currency with a current market cap of $2.64B. Might want to look into it.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 4, 2013
If we ever have a world-changing EMP solar flare event, the Amish are going to be like, "And what?"
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 4, 2013
Unforgettable, unconcealed, what can't be hidden. Fascinating to study the Greek origins of the word truth. Jesus is truth. John 14:6
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) November 3, 2013
October 2013
You have to be born before you can crawl. Walking comes way later.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 28, 2013
Just thought of another thing my kids will never know: photo film. Joins the list with home phone, VHS, cassette, floppy disk, etc
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 26, 2013
Every life changes the world in some way. Why not yours? Why not on purpose? Why not for good? We need more agents of positive change.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 25, 2013
If you wake up many years from now discouraged and thinking, "I worked my whole life... for this?" start making different decisions today.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 25, 2013
Want to be wealthy? True wealth is having time and freedom. Jesus Christ came to set the captives free and give us a eternity.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 24, 2013
If there is such a thing as a global consciousness, it will probably be statistically discovered by analyzing tweets.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 23, 2013
What do you want?
Why?
Good questions to ask yourself.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 23, 2013
Humanity in the future: "Debt-based monetary system? Yeah, that probably wasn't a very good idea."
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 22, 2013
Tonight you'll look back on what you did today. Make sure some of it was invested in relationships.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 21, 2013
The first step in sticking to your priorities is knowing what they are.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 20, 2013
There is plenty more volatility to come in the Bitcoin price. It's like the early days of the Internet and most don't "get" it yet.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 19, 2013
The things that bother you in others are quite often the very things which need improvement in your own character.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 18, 2013
S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch. Goldman, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan, Bank of America, Barclays, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo. Is it just a game?
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 15, 2013
Trying to understand who is selling the MBS the Fed is buying. http://t.co/0wzfTH1fYd "primary dealers"? So... banking cartel, yeah?
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 14, 2013
One of the coolest things about #Bitcoin is it gets people to ask, "What is money, anyway?"
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 13, 2013
Success comes from the relationships in your life. So blessed by these great men. pic.twitter.com/ZmyqTRs7X2
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 12, 2013
Nashville, you're beautiful. So nice outside today. Loving that I can work remotely to enjoy it. pic.twitter.com/LdHUiCf6jK
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 11, 2013
If you've been using the words Republican, Democrat, or Tea Party a lot lately, you might be missing the point. We need @RepresentDotUs
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 10, 2013
If technical society collapses, the Amish are going to have the biggest "I told you so" ever.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 9, 2013
Is it a problem if I want to learn everything?
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 8, 2013
World Bank. International Monetary Fund. Bank of International Settlements. If you're looking for real criminals, look no further.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 6, 2013
The more we think government is the answer, the more obvious it becomes we don't understand the question.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 5, 2013
Debt not only enslaves us, it shackles our giving to those in need because of financial commitments to billionaire bankers.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 5, 2013
#Bitcoin is a honey badger. It doesn't care about Silk Road. pic.twitter.com/L7vBvDEbBh
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 4, 2013
Maybe we should rename the Bureau Of Labor Statistics to something more appropriate. Ministry of Employment Propaganda maybe?
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 4, 2013
For me, this photo by @davidmolnar summarizes success. It's about love, life, freedom, friends, and family. pic.twitter.com/fbRxJxfGQt
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 4, 2013
I think success includes recognizing the blessings all around us today. It's not merely something to be achieved on some future date.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 4, 2013
When it comes to success, don't spend decades achieving it only to find you had an incomplete definition of the word.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 3, 2013
So I woke up this morning, and America is still here. I'm confused. #governmentshutdown
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) October 1, 2013
Thursday, December 26, 2013
So You Got Some Bitcoin… Now What?
My family knows how consumed I am with Bitcoin. I first discovered it in February and have spent countless hours researching it. I'm glad to say they are super supportive and excited about it also. For Christmas, I shared my passion by giving them bitcoins as gifts. Everyone was so stoked and declined my offer to manage the bitcoins for them. They all want to learn more about owning and using them. Here's my post to them and hopefully to your friends and family as well.
Bitcoins are Digital Cash
Bitcoins exist as amounts recorded in a public ledger (the blockchain) at various Bitcoin addresses. Each address has a public and private key. If you lose access to your private key, bitcoins stored at that address will be lost forever. There is no one to complain to. Keep your private key private. Your public key is fine to share. That's the address others can send bitcoins to. Coinbase makes this easy by managing all your public and private keys for you.Security is Priority Number One
You are the bank. There is no vault door protecting your investment. That's why your computer has to be secured against hackers and thieves. My first recommendation is to have an up-to-date antivirus software running at all times. You should also use a password management program like LastPass or 1Password. These programs will protect you from phishing attacks, make key logging almost irrelevant, and equip you to create strong individual passwords for every site which needs them. Please, never reuse passwords. If you're using 1Password, you can securely store and sync your password database across multiple devices using Dropbox.Working With Coinbase
Your bitcoins were gifted to you via Coinbase. Coinbase is an online wallet which means they manage your bitcoin addresses and your private keys. You can send bitcoin to your Coinbase account by going to Account Settings -> Bitcoin Addresses. Coinbase creates a new public address with every transaction and sending bitcoin to any of those addresses will credit your account.Sending Bitcoin for the First Time
A great exercise for understanding how Bitcoin works is to send some from one account to another. Set up a wallet at blockchain.info. If you're using 1Password, be sure to save the Identifier string as well. Once that account is created, you can copy your Bitcoin address, head back to coinbase.com and click the Send/Request option. Click Send Money, paste the address, and send a small amount, such as 1 millibit (.001 bitcoins). It's fun to have the blockchain.info window open in another tab when you do this so you can see how quickly the system works. Say goodbye to 3-5 business days to transfer money between accounts. :) Also, if you want to keep some bitcoin online for purchasing goods and services via your smart phone, the blockchain.info app works well. Depending on the circumstances, you may have to pay a very small transaction fee, but most of the time it will be free.Setting Up a Paper Wallet
Throughout the history of Bitcoin, there have been a series of hacks on the online exchanges. The very best way to store your bitcoins and to eliminate this risk is to store them offline. This is done via creating a paper wallet through services like bitaddress.org. There are plenty of tutorials online for booting off a CD, disconnecting your computer from the Internet, and printing out your paper wallets. Depending on the amount of bitcoin you're storing, that may be overkill. Once you create your paper wallets, you can send various amounts from Coinbase to those wallet public addresses. Later they can easily be imported back into a standalone Bitcoin client or any of the major online wallets. It's a good idea to store these in a secure, water-proof place such as a safe or safe deposit box. Some people also email or mail portions of the import keys as a backup to friends and relatives so they can be reconstructed later if needed.Bitcoin as an Investment?
Some (including me) believe bitcoins will have a much higher value in the future. How high could they go? I've heard everything from $1,300 per coin to over $1M per coin Sound crazy? Well, when you think about the size of the remittances market, the daily forex market, services like MoneyGram and Western Union, those who store value in gold and silver, the number of ecommerce transactions, donations, etc… even a small percentage of those activities done via bitcoin would create a big disruption (especially since there will only ever be 21 million bitcoins).Bitcoin as Money?
The number of stores accepting bitcoin is increasing all the time with big announcements almost every month. For example, overstock.com recently said they will accept bitcoin as payment in 2014. You can also buy gyft gift cards with bitcoin which, in essence, lets you buy anything from the many vendors they support. Also, keep in mind there are 100,000,000 divisions in each bitcoin which means you can do micro transactions for fractions of a penny.Cashing Out Your Bitcoins
Since you now have an account with Coinbase, cashing out your bitcoins to old-fashioned fiat currency is really easy. You just have to set up your Coinbase account to have access to your bank account. I trust them, and if you use the method they offer which logs directly into your bank, you can be up and running in minutes. Selling your bitcoins back to Coinbase will result in a bank deposit within 3 to 5 business days.Taxes
Though some ultra-libertarians and anarcho-capitialists want to pretend bitcoin usage can fly under the radar of the IRS, the truth is today they are not anonymous and are always taxable. That means you need to keep track of a few things:- The date you obtained them.
- The market value at the time you obtained them.
- The date you sell them, give them as a gift, or use them to purchase something (any taxable event).
- The market value at the time of the taxable event.
Why Bother?
Well... to fuller understand my perspective on why Bitcoin (the protocol) and bitcoins (the currency used on the Bitcoin network) are so revolutionary, feel free to explore some of my other posts on the subject. In a nutshell, Bitcoin provides a decentralized public ledger which could make many financial institutions today irrelevant. They empower individuals to store and use the value they create without any third party risk with complete control to send that value to anyone anywhere in the world in minutes for free.- March 2013 - Bitcoin: DO YOU SPEAK IT???
- April 2013 - My Bitcoin Obsession
- April 2013 - Why Does FoxyCart Support Bitcoin?
- November 2013 - Could Bitcoin Be More Disruptive than the Internet?
- December 2013 - Why Shouldn't You Accept Bitcoin?
I hope this post was helpful to you and your friends and relatives entering the amazing world of Bitcoin. If you'd like to support content like this, feel free to send donations here: 1BxUs1hjWzYLEYdECbrRTJJtcTmwBzNtFN
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Living Beyond the Veneer
When we interact with people, we rarely truly engage them as living human beings. We're more often interacting with our limited understanding of who they are. We're dealing with a mental representation of them which filters through our world view, life experiences, prejudices, expectations, desires, labels, judgements, insecurities, and fears. Truly seeing them and being vulnerable is difficult because it requires fresh eyes, lots of questions, and even more listening.
This game perpetuates itself by the representations we ourselves meticulously create for others to perceive. These veneers never stand the test of time nor do they allow us to communicate and understand each other effectively.
I don't claim to have answers or to even know the right questions, but I do want to do better. I want to see, listen, and love.
Expect that from me and please love me enough to tell me when I fall short.
This game perpetuates itself by the representations we ourselves meticulously create for others to perceive. These veneers never stand the test of time nor do they allow us to communicate and understand each other effectively.
I don't claim to have answers or to even know the right questions, but I do want to do better. I want to see, listen, and love.
Expect that from me and please love me enough to tell me when I fall short.
Sunday, October 06, 2013
Power Is the Ability to Create Need
Power: the capacity or ability to direct or influence the behavior of others or the course of events.
Here's another way to think about it:
Power is the ability to create need in others.
The next time you feel powerless or you're upset about your unmet (or possibly uncommunicated) expectations, ask yourself, who has power over me? What need do I have, and who put it there?
The obvious culprit is the main stream media controlled by a very small number of corporations. As you move beyond this influence, you arrive to your family, friends, neighbors, fellow church gowers, coworkers, etc. Most of them probably form their needs based on the 4,000 or so advertisements thrown at them daily. So you're back at the mainstream media again.
Needs are most often created in your mind by outside forces.
Those in power all around us create needs. They don't even have to be real needs. As long as we believe our "want" or "desire" is a need, we'll be controlled by it. Governments and corporations do this daily.
The trick is being free of falsely created needs.
If you're reading this in the United States, chances are you're already more wealthy than most people living in the world. Stuck in debt? The house and car you "own" may be a need created by someone else. Maybe you have a need to watch your favorite nightly shows instead of something more productive. The need to eat out? The need for fine clothes? The need for latest smart phone?
Use whatever example works for you. The important point is this: the needs which often define the every day actions of our lives may not be real needs at all. We may have been convinced by others to adopt them. The things which feel out of our control might simply be readjustments in our thinking of needs.
Our parents and grandparents worked for years to obtain what many of us expect right out of college. Our expectations are powerful. If we let others create them for us, we give them power that was meant for us.
Don't blindly let others create needs in your life unless you're actively choosing them yourself. Live intentionally and evaluate the powers you're willing to give up.
To be clear, I'm not stating absolute truths here... just throwing out some thoughts for contemplation and discussion. Did it get you thinking differently? What needs do you have which hold power over you?
Side note: after finishing this post, I watched Zeitgeist: Moving Forward last night which was really thought provoking. A quote which stood out to me: "You have to create problems to create profit."
To be clear, I'm not stating absolute truths here... just throwing out some thoughts for contemplation and discussion. Did it get you thinking differently? What needs do you have which hold power over you?
Side note: after finishing this post, I watched Zeitgeist: Moving Forward last night which was really thought provoking. A quote which stood out to me: "You have to create problems to create profit."
Tuesday, July 16, 2013
Hackathons for Remote Teams
Last Thursday we did something unique. We did a 24 hour remote team hackathon across 7 different timezones. There's a full write-up over at the FoxyCart blog, and I'm proud of it. Give it a read and let me know what you think.
Thursday, July 04, 2013
Admit It. You're Insecure. We All Are.
On Monday, I sent out my first viral tweet.
By Tuesday, I was surprised to see new retweets and favorites still coming in. I struck a nerve. Over 200 retweets in less than two days!
And before you ask, no, I haven't yet received a check from Twitter. I, like many, have often wondered what it would be like to watch a 140-character idea populate the interwebs. Contrary to popular belief, it didn't change my life. I still have to go to work and do my best to build awesome.
The past few days, I've been thinking about this tweet and why it resonated with so many people. I've sent over 12k tweets and never received this response.
Why?
I'm part of a master mind group of 12 individuals who meet every Wednesday morning. At the recommendation of Jeff Goins, we recently read The Icarus Deception. Building art is hard, and whether or not we want to admit it, we're all artists in some way. The deception is we'll fly too high and endanger our wax wings. We forget how the parable also warns us of flying too low to the water.
Don't settle.
If you're read authors like Seth Godin or Steven Pressfield, you're already familiar with the concept of the Lizard Brain and the Resistance. The voices in your head telling you you're a fraud. Telling you you'll never succeed. Trying to convince you you never really grew up and you're just a kid pretending to be an adult.
You're insecure. So are those around you. Even the prideful, arrogant ones. That might not be obvious, but I believe it's true. They are often the ones trying harder than anyone to prove their worth. Man-pleasing, insecurity, and pride often work closely together. They are all trying to handcuff you.
So what can you do about it? Admit it. Understand how it works against you and work out a solution. The insecurity holding us back is, at its very core, basically a lie.
Stop.
Admit the weakness. Understand how it prevents you from moving forward and discredit the lies it is based on. Once you can do that, you can create a path towards incredible success.
Along the way, you will fail. If you intend to be great, you will fail a lot. Use each failure to strengthen your mental and emotional muscles. Remind yourself you're not in physical danger and the fear you felt in the beginning was in fact a lie. Celebrate each small step of progress and learn from your mistakes. This is what great men in history have always done.
As Jon Acuff would say, Punch Fear in the Face. Admit your insecurities, understand how lies limit you, and move beyond them. No one can give you permission to be great but you. When you believe it, even just a little bit, you'll start doing great things. Stay humble and hungry and there's nothing you can't accomplish.
Within your profession, what fears paralyze you?
As a programmer, it's easy to be paralyzed with lack of confidence in your skills. Instead: solve problems, add value, keep learning.
— Luke Stokes (@lukestokes) July 1, 2013
By Tuesday, I was surprised to see new retweets and favorites still coming in. I struck a nerve. Over 200 retweets in less than two days!
And before you ask, no, I haven't yet received a check from Twitter. I, like many, have often wondered what it would be like to watch a 140-character idea populate the interwebs. Contrary to popular belief, it didn't change my life. I still have to go to work and do my best to build awesome.
The past few days, I've been thinking about this tweet and why it resonated with so many people. I've sent over 12k tweets and never received this response.
Why?
I'm part of a master mind group of 12 individuals who meet every Wednesday morning. At the recommendation of Jeff Goins, we recently read The Icarus Deception. Building art is hard, and whether or not we want to admit it, we're all artists in some way. The deception is we'll fly too high and endanger our wax wings. We forget how the parable also warns us of flying too low to the water.
Don't settle.
If you're read authors like Seth Godin or Steven Pressfield, you're already familiar with the concept of the Lizard Brain and the Resistance. The voices in your head telling you you're a fraud. Telling you you'll never succeed. Trying to convince you you never really grew up and you're just a kid pretending to be an adult.
You're insecure. So are those around you. Even the prideful, arrogant ones. That might not be obvious, but I believe it's true. They are often the ones trying harder than anyone to prove their worth. Man-pleasing, insecurity, and pride often work closely together. They are all trying to handcuff you.
So what can you do about it? Admit it. Understand how it works against you and work out a solution. The insecurity holding us back is, at its very core, basically a lie.
Insecurity: the state of being subject to danger or injury.If your next project is a total failure, will you really be in physical danger? Will you really be injured? The answer (for most professions, anyway) is no. And yet, we still believe the lie.
Stop.
Admit the weakness. Understand how it prevents you from moving forward and discredit the lies it is based on. Once you can do that, you can create a path towards incredible success.
Along the way, you will fail. If you intend to be great, you will fail a lot. Use each failure to strengthen your mental and emotional muscles. Remind yourself you're not in physical danger and the fear you felt in the beginning was in fact a lie. Celebrate each small step of progress and learn from your mistakes. This is what great men in history have always done.
"If I find 10,000 ways something won't work, I haven't failed. I am not discouraged, because every wrong attempt discarded is another step forward." Thomas A. EdisonStart today.
As Jon Acuff would say, Punch Fear in the Face. Admit your insecurities, understand how lies limit you, and move beyond them. No one can give you permission to be great but you. When you believe it, even just a little bit, you'll start doing great things. Stay humble and hungry and there's nothing you can't accomplish.
Within your profession, what fears paralyze you?
Monday, June 24, 2013
This Bothers Me
- The US government goes to war or uses funds/weapons/CIA operatives to topple governments it considers a threat to US interests. It doesn't matter if those governments were democratically elected. Usually it involves countries that don't want to play by crony capitalism or global central banking rules. Oh, also, the actual people of the United States don't support these wars or government coup d'états.
- In the name of fighting "terrorism" and protecting American citizens, our elected officials pass police-state laws and implement liberty-crushing systems (Prism, the Patriot Act, NDAA, etc).
- When someone witnesses deception/crimes against humanity and tries to tell people about it (Daniel Ellsberg, Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden, and others), the government considers them a threat and argues their actions risk the lives of military and intelligence personnel (see bullet point 1).
Does anyone else see the circular logic here?
When the branches of government (or, more accurately, the military industrial complex and the bankers/corporations who profit) take action the people don't want (1), put systems of control in place (i.e. tools for fascists) (2), and are discovered when someone points out the misuse of these tools, they site the danger it will create for those at war (3). We're back at (1) again, this time protecting something the people never wanted.
When the branches of government (or, more accurately, the military industrial complex and the bankers/corporations who profit) take action the people don't want (1), put systems of control in place (i.e. tools for fascists) (2), and are discovered when someone points out the misuse of these tools, they site the danger it will create for those at war (3). We're back at (1) again, this time protecting something the people never wanted.
The claims above aren't baseless, but many Americans aren't familiar with them because of who owns the mainstream media. If the nightly news passes judgment on a foreign nation or leader, we often unquestionably consider it the truth. What if there's more to the story?
If even 50% of what follows in these videos and documentaries is true, shouldn't we be talking about it? Why talk about the weather or last night's reality TV show when we can talk about more significant things that impact lives around the world?
Some things I've found interesting lately:
The War On Democracy (1:34 hours)
All Wars Are Bankers' Wars (43 min)
CIA Agent Explains How Al-Qaeda Doesn't Exist (11 min)
The Road to World War 3 (13 min)
The Terrifying Future of The United States (12 min)
** Who Really Owns the Mainstream Media?? ** (11 min)
How the Media Controls Society (13 min)
I'm not saying these videos are smoking guns of proof. I'm simply saying, shouldn't we talk about this stuff? Shouldn't these be a starting point for more research and open discussion? I guarantee there are factual inaccuracies, but what about the facts? What if critical thinking could help us find some truth?
Why don't the majority of our conversations revolve around things we deeply care about?
There are things in this world that bother me. They may not bother you or you may completely disagree with me. Can't we talk about them openly?
Here goes. Here's a list I compiled on 5/30/2013 of things that bother me:
- Loss of my worldview that our country represents the "good guys," spreading freedom and democracy
- Drone strikes and the uncontrolled military industrial complex (see War is a Racket)
- The war on drugs and how completely ineffective it has been (see drug prices)
- The central banking system and global debt slavery (see Creature from Jekyll Island)
- Abortion and eugenics
- Monsanto and the control/poisoning of our food supply
- The treatment of whistle blowers
- Gitmo
- Lies / deception related to the CIA and our involvement in funding / creating terrorist organizations to destabilize governments who don't want to play by the international banking rules (i.e. petrol dollar)
- MK Ultra and whatever versions of it are in operation today
- The centralization of mass media in the hands of a very few which effectively controls the masses by controlling the conversation
I don't list these things to spread fear or depress you. They are listed here so I can get them out in the open and discuss them. Are there action steps to be found? Is there something specific we can do about these issues (or others that may bother you)?
Looking at the list again, I'd like to add a few more like child trafficking and sex slavery.
What would you include?
Looking at the list again, I'd like to add a few more like child trafficking and sex slavery.
What would you include?
My last post was about how many of us are often too busy to care and the system we're part of keeps us that way. Shouldn't that bother us?
I don't have the answers, but I'm just starting to look for them. I'm not alone.
Sunday, June 16, 2013
We're Too Busy to Care
Most people are working frantically to keep up with their mortgage, school loans, and credit card payments. Some are working two jobs. No time for quality family time. Weekends are filled with diversions because "we deserve it" having worked so hard all week.
Almost our entire lives are spent working for a paycheck, and yet most of us haven't spent time to understand how money actually works. Central banking, fractional reserve lending, and fiat currencies are things for the crazy "occupy" people to worry about. We're busy watching football or Americon Idol.
And yet, we know intrinsically something is wrong. We get that politicians and those in power are corrupt, but what can we do about it? We're too busy. We're clocked in. No time to read a Wikipedia page, watch a documentary, or read a book. Bills are due. Payments have to be made.
We're immersed in a system designed to keep us from asking questions. The system punishes and labels those who don't fit in. We're like frogs in a slowly heating pot of water.
We're immersed in a system designed to keep us from asking questions. The system punishes and labels those who don't fit in. We're like frogs in a slowly heating pot of water.
What if your employer gave you the freedom to live your life on your own terms? What if you could set your own hours? What if you could spend an afternoon with your family and work later that night instead of watching TV? What if you had the freedom to research and learn things on your own schedule? What if the standard 9-5 model could be changed via creative thinking and technology?
Don't be too busy for life. Work so you have the freedom to live, learn, and act. Our world has some serious problems right now. Governments around the world are losing credibility and losing approval at an alarming rate. Difficult problems won't go away if we only make time for entertainment television, or if we're hopeless enslaved by debt.
This post may not be for you. You might be hanging on by your fingernails. Instead, this post is for those who are meant to catch you if you fall.
This post may not be for you. You might be hanging on by your fingernails. Instead, this post is for those who are meant to catch you if you fall.
All of us need to get informed. We need to change the conversations we have with our friends and neighbors. Let's start talking about things that matter. Let's care enough to make some changes. Downsize, change jobs, cut out some monthly expenses. Drastic times call for drastic measures.
Don't sit back and let life happen to you. Take action. Many believe a huge financial collapse is coming (and is actually already taking place). What will you do if that happens? Take some steps to provide for your family.
If you have a business idea, pursue it now. Those who control their own income will be in the best position in the future, no matter what happens. It took me 5 years working long hours to build my own business. It's not easy, but it's worth it. Get rid of the stuff keeping you too busy to care.
Most likely, this post won't change your mind about much. It wouldn't have impacted me not long ago. I was so used to the stereotypes of the system, I couldn't see around them. But these thoughts just might plant a seed and help you realize sometime in the future you do have a choice.
--
Some things I've been reading/listening to/watching lately:
Work Smarter - 11 Ted Talks
Secrets of the Millionaire Mind
The Icarus Deception
Predictably Irrational
Lean Analytics
The Keiser Report
If you have a business idea, pursue it now. Those who control their own income will be in the best position in the future, no matter what happens. It took me 5 years working long hours to build my own business. It's not easy, but it's worth it. Get rid of the stuff keeping you too busy to care.
Most likely, this post won't change your mind about much. It wouldn't have impacted me not long ago. I was so used to the stereotypes of the system, I couldn't see around them. But these thoughts just might plant a seed and help you realize sometime in the future you do have a choice.
--
Some things I've been reading/listening to/watching lately:
Work Smarter - 11 Ted Talks
Secrets of the Millionaire Mind
The Icarus Deception
Predictably Irrational
Lean Analytics
The Keiser Report
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)